, , ,

Understand Native, Hybrid and Cross-Platform App Development

high angle photo of person holding turned on smartphone with tall buildings background

The choice between native, cross-platform, and hybrid app development has become a significant decision for developers and businesses alike. Understanding the differences between these app types is not just a technical necessity but a strategic business decision that can impact user experience, development cost, and the overall success of the app.

When Hybrid App Development Entered The Scene

Hybrid apps entered the software development scene around the early 2010s. The rapid growth of mobile devices and the demand for cross-platform applications led to the emergence of hybrid app frameworks. PhoneGap, now known as Apache Cordova, was one of the pioneering frameworks that allowed developers to build mobile apps using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. This breakthrough opened up new possibilities for developers to create apps that could run on multiple platforms using a single codebase.

Popular and Less Popular Solutions

Over the years, several hybrid app development frameworks have gained popularity. Some of the popular ones include:

  • React Native: Developed by Facebook, React Native allows developers to build native-like apps using JavaScript and React.
  • Flutter: Created by Google, Flutter enables developers to build high-performance apps using a single codebase written in Dart.
  • Ionic: Built on top of Angular, Ionic provides a comprehensive set of UI components and tools for building hybrid apps.

While these frameworks have gained significant traction, there are also lesser-known solutions such as Xamarin, Sencha Touch, and NativeScript that offer unique features and capabilities.

Benefits and Downsides of Hybrid Apps

Hybrid apps offer several advantages:

  • Cost and Time Efficiency:
    • Single Codebase: One of the key advantages of hybrid apps is the use of a single codebase for multiple platforms, such as iOS and Android. This means that developers can write the code once and deploy it across various platforms, saving a significant amount of time and effort.
    • Unified Development Team: Since hybrid apps can be developed using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, a single development team can work on both the iOS and Android versions simultaneously. This eliminates the need to hire separate teams for each platform, leading to cost savings.
  • Code Reusability:
    • Faster Development: Since developers don’t have to start from scratch for each platform, the overall development process is faster. Any updates or changes can be applied uniformly across all platforms, ensuring consistency.
    • Cross-Platform Compatibility: Hybrid apps leverage frameworks like Apache Cordova, React Native, or Flutter, which allow for the reuse of a substantial portion of the codebase. Developers can create a core set of functionalities that can be shared across different platforms, reducing redundancy and making maintenance more straightforward.
  • Access to Device Features:
    • Plugin Integration: Hybrid apps can access native device features through plugins. These plugins act as bridges between the web application and the device’s native features such as camera, GPS, accelerometer, and more. This allows developers to incorporate native-like functionalities into their hybrid apps, providing a seamless user experience.
    • Native-Like Performance: While the core of a hybrid app is built using web technologies, the access to native device features through plugins ensures that the app can achieve performance levels close to that of native apps. Users may not even notice a significant difference in terms of speed or responsiveness.
  • Wider Reach:
    • Distribution on Multiple App Stores: Hybrid apps can be easily distributed through popular app stores like Apple App Store and Google Play Store. This broader distribution helps in reaching a larger audience without the need for separate app versions.
    • Updates and Maintenance: Updates and maintenance can be applied simultaneously to all platforms, ensuring that users across different devices receive the latest features, bug fixes, and security updates at the same time.

However, there are also downsides to consider:

  • Performance Limitations:
    • Rendering Speed: Hybrid apps often rely on web views to display content. While this approach provides cross-platform compatibility, it can result in slower rendering speeds compared to native apps, especially for graphics-intensive or complex applications.
    • Limited Access to Hardware Acceleration: Native apps have better access to device resources and can leverage hardware acceleration more efficiently. Hybrid apps, on the other hand, might face limitations in harnessing the full power of the device’s hardware, impacting performance in scenarios that demand intensive computational processes or graphical rendering.
  • Dependency on Web Technologies:
    • Limited Access to Native APIs: Hybrid apps depend on web technologies such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, which may not offer direct access to certain device features or native APIs. While plugins can bridge this gap to some extent, there might be delays in adopting new native features that are not yet supported by the hybrid framework or available through plugins.
    • Web View Constraints: The reliance on web views can lead to differences in the way content is displayed across devices, as it is ultimately dependent on the browser engine and version on each platform. This can result in inconsistencies in user interface rendering.
  • User Experience Challenges:
    • Platform-Specific Design Guidelines: Achieving a consistent and seamless user experience across different platforms can be challenging. Each platform (iOS, Android, etc.) has its own set of design guidelines and user interface conventions. Adhering to these guidelines while maintaining a unified codebase can be complex and might require platform-specific adjustments.
    • Performance Variability: Devices running the same hybrid app may exhibit varying performance levels due to differences in hardware specifications. Ensuring a consistently smooth user experience across a diverse range of devices can be a significant challenge.

Difference between Hybrid and Native Apps

While hybrid apps share some similarities with native apps, they have distinct differences:

  • Codebase: Hybrid apps use a single codebase that can be deployed across multiple platforms, whereas native apps require separate codebases for each platform.
  • Performance: Native apps generally offer better performance and responsiveness compared to hybrid apps, as they are specifically optimized for the target platform.
  • User Experience: Native apps provide a more consistent and platform-specific user experience, while hybrid apps may have limitations in achieving the same level of UI/UX.

Hybrid Apps vs. Cross-Platform Development

  • Hybrid App Development:
    • Technology Stack: Hybrid apps are developed using web technologies such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. The core of the application runs within a web view, essentially a browser window embedded within a native app container.
    • Native Container: The web-based content is wrapped in a native container (like Apache Cordova or Capacitor), which enables it to be deployed as a standalone app on different platforms.
    • Code Execution: The code for a hybrid app is executed within the web view, allowing developers to use a single codebase to create applications that can run on multiple platforms.
  • Cross-Platform Development:
    • Technology Stack: Cross-platform development involves using frameworks such as React Native, Flutter, Xamarin, or others. These frameworks allow developers to write code using a common language (like JavaScript for React Native or Dart for Flutter) that can be translated into native code for each platform.
    • Platform-Specific Code: Unlike hybrid apps, cross-platform development often involves writing platform-specific code in addition to the shared code. This allows developers to take advantage of native APIs and features.
    • Single Codebase: The primary goal of cross-platform development is to maintain a single codebase while still achieving a native-like experience on each platform.

Difference between Hybrid and Cross-Platform Development

  • Underlying Technology:
    • Hybrid Apps: Primarily use web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.
    • Cross-Platform Development: Involves using frameworks to write code that can be translated into native code for each platform.
  • Execution Environment:
    • Hybrid Apps: Execute code within a web view, often within a native container.
    • Cross-Platform Development: Translates code into native instructions, allowing it to run directly on the device.
  • Code Focus:
    • Hybrid Apps: Lean more towards web development principles, with a focus on using web technologies and rendering content within a web view.
    • Cross-Platform Development: Focus on creating a native-like experience by leveraging platform-specific capabilities and optimizing performance.
  • Access to Native Features:
    • Hybrid Apps: Rely on plugins to access native features, and there might be limitations in terms of accessing the full spectrum of native APIs.
    • Cross-Platform Development: Allows for direct access to native features, often requiring the inclusion of some platform-specific code
Man Sitting in Front of Three Computers

Native, Web, & Hybrid At A Glance

The follwoing table is designed to equip decision-makers like you with a clear, concise comparison of these three primary app development methodologies.. From considering development time and costs to evaluating market access, maintenance needs, scalability, and security, our table aims to provide a holistic view of each approach. Whether your priority is achieving a high-performance application, minimizing costs, or ensuring rapid market entry, this guide serves as an essential tool in your decision-making arsenal, helping you choose the most appropriate solution for your specific needs and goals.

FeatureNativeWeb-onlyHybridCross-Platform (React Native/Flutter)
Device AccessFullLimitedFull (with plugins)
Full (near-native access)

PerformanceHighMedium to HighMedium to High
High (comparable to native)

Development LanguagePlatform SpecificHTML, CSS, JavascriptHTML, CSS, Javascript
Dart (Flutter), JavaScript (React Native)

Cross-Platform SupportNoYesYesYes
User ExperienceHighMedium to HighMedium to High
High (rich, near-native UI/UX)

Code ReuseNoYesYes
Yes (significant code reuse across platforms)

Development TimeLonger (due to separate codebases)Shorter (single codebase)Medium (depends on the complexity of native integration)
Shorter (faster than native, slightly more than web-only)

CostHigher (separate development for each platform)
Lower (due to code reuse and simpler technologies)

Medium (higher than web-only, lower than native)

Medium (more cost-effective than native)

Market Access
Full access to app stores
Access through web browsers; limited app store presence

Full access to app stores with native wrapper

Full access to app stores

MaintenanceHigher (separate updates for each platform)
Lower (one update affects all platforms)

Medium (easier than native but more complex than web-only)

Medium (simplified compared to native)

ScalabilityHigh (can handle complex functionalities better)
Medium (limited by browser capabilities)

Medium to High (can scale well but might face limitations in complex scenarios)

High (robust scalability)

SecurityHigh (benefits from platform’s inherent security features)
Medium (depends on web security measures)
Medium to High (good, but reliant on the security of the web layer)
High (robust security features)


Hybrid apps have revolutionized software development by offering a balance between native and web applications. They provide a cost-effective solution for building cross-platform apps, allowing developers to leverage their existing web development skills. However, it is important to understand the benefits and limitations of hybrid apps compared to native apps, as well as the distinction between hybrid and cross-platform development, to make informed decisions when choosing the right approach for your project.

Our View As A Development Agency

While the landscape of mobile app development is rich with options, each serving different project needs from performance to user experience and cost-efficiency, our comprehensive evaluation of trends and technologies consistently points to Flutter as a preferred choice for many of our clients’ requirements.

Flutter’s robust framework offers the best of both worlds, blending seamless performance with aesthetic flexibility, all while ensuring cross-platform functionality. It empowers us to craft beautiful, natively compiled applications for mobile, web, and desktop from a single codebase, which translates into a consistent user experience and streamlined development process.

Whether you’re looking to create an MVP or scale an enterprise-level application, Flutter provides the agility and efficiency required to adapt to your evolving needs. It’s an exciting time to leverage the full potential of Flutter to meet the sophisticated demands of today’s mobile app users.

Ready to explore how Flutter can elevate your mobile app ambitions? We invite you to reach out to us. Our team is eager to understand your unique requirements and discuss how we can turn your vision into a vivid digital reality. Let’s create something remarkable together.

Would you like to get engaged with professional Specialists?

We are a software development team with extensive development experience in the Hybrid and Crossplatform Applications development space. Let’s discuss your needs and requirements to find your best fit.

Aditi Diwan Avatar

More On This Topic